Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Older Reviews- Adventureland

            Adventureland, released this Friday, is about as much of an adventure as the theme park it takes place in. The film is yet another soft indie comedy about young adults with mellow indie music in the background (think Juno, Nick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist); however, within the realm of the genre, Adventureland is touching, funny, well-acted, and well scripted, and as such worth spending an evening watching.

            The film stars Jesse Eisenberg (an adorably awkward male version of his sister Hallie Kate Eisenberg, aka “the Pepsi girl”) as James Brennan, a recent college grad told last-minute that his parents not only cannot sponsor his post-graduation trip to Europe but won’t pay for his tuition to Columbia’s school of journalism. “Not even qualified for manual labor,” in James’ words, he takes a summer job as a games operator at the sleazy theme park called “Adventureland,” where games are rigged, rides dismember their passengers, and “nobody ever wins a giant f-ing panda.”

            The movie is extremely realistic. It almost feels like someone filmed a bunch of adolescents working at a theme park and placed it on the screen. The dialogue is sparse in places, but in a way that suggests that the screenwriter personally went and listened to conversations to get a feel for the natural rhythm and style of speech and molded it carefully into dialogue. It’s easy to see the film and feel not only a connection but a familiarity in the characters, aided in part by the acting.

            Jesse Eisenberg is delightfully awkward as James and should have a decent career as the innocent young adult type. Kristen Stewart plays the same type of realistic pretty yet troubled young girl that she usually plays, but as she plays it well, the audience can forgive the typecasting. Martin Starr and Bill Hader provide consistent comic relief, with Starr as the overzealous manager of the park and Hader as James’ apathetic coworker. Ryan Reynolds is every bit a movie star among a cast of character actors as sleazy maintenance man Mike Connell. And Jack Gilpin gives a wonderfully understated performance as James’ father, saying no more than five lines but communicating at least forty more with his facial expressions.

            The film does go on for a bit longer than necessary. There are several unnecessary subplots that add to the realism of the film but slow the pace and the drama. The film borrows heavily from other films in the genre plot-wise, and some of the jokes and plot twists wax cliché. There is the young-looking park virgin slut Lisa P. who takes up far too much screen time, and apparently vomit jokes are essential to any movie about roller coasters. That said, there may not be an adventure in “Adventureland,” but the viewer will still have the pleasant experience that comes with the lazy days of summer torture-jobs that we hate and then miss for years on end. Such is the experience of Adventureland.

Grade: B+

Older Reviews- 88 Minutes

            Like Cellular, Phone Booth, and other cheesy action thrillers of its kind, 88 Minutes is good for one thing only: entertainment and humor at the film’s expense. Of course, Cellular and Phone Booth never had Al Pacino along for the ride.

            Pacino stars as Dr. Jack Gramm, a forensic psychiatrist responsible for putting accused serial murderer Jon Forester (Neal McDonogh) on death row. The day that Forester is set to die, one of Gramm’s students is found murdered in the same manner as Forester’s alleged victims, and Gramm receives a phone call, informing him that he has 88 minutes to live. The rest of the film consists of Pacino running around and trying to figure out who is trying to kill him before he or she succeeds.

            The film is filled with an army of plot holes. Gramm’s would-be murderer goes out of his way to frame him for the other murders. However, it does not make any sense to try to frame a man who is about to become the next victim- it would completely defeat the purpose. As Kim Cummings, Gramm’s teaching assistant, Alicia Witt acts so guilty throughout the film that when she is found to have nothing to do with the crime itself, every single suspicious expression ceases to have a purpose. Stephen Moyer follows Dr. Gramm around the entire day for reasons that have nothing to do with the death threats, and the viewer never finds out why. There is a subplot involving Gramm’s younger sister, giving Gramm motivation against Forester, but why on earth the murderer is so keen on using the subplot against Gramm is never made clear. And why is Gramm so ready to let Kim out of his sight when he’s refusing to trust anyone during his last 88 minutes?
            To be fair, the doctor has a lot on his mind. The film takes place in real time, so both Pacino and the murderer have to be very industrious. Of course, this is absolutely the biggest plothole in the film- it is inconceivable that the murderer and Gramm can engage in a terror-filled, information-grabbing, chase-scene bonanza of this caliber in less time than it takes for me to write this review. If the average person is given 88 minutes to live, the most they will be able to accomplish is a few phone calls and maybe a run to the drugstore. But these people are running around, smashing cars, dodging police, kidnapping and raping young woman, all in the space of 88 minutes. It is completely unbelievable.

            But that is exactly why I am recommending this movie. Yes, it’s goofy. Yes, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. But it’s fun to watch. Al Pacino is one of the best actors of our time period, and there’s a definite pleasure in following him for 88 (well, 108) minutes, even with the shoddy screenplay. There are stunts and lines meant to be poignant that come off as cheesy, but the audience is likely to have a good laugh or two about them. If next Friday night comes around, go see this movie with a couple of friends and laugh at the characters’ expense. After all, if you’ve only got 88 minutes, you may as well spend them laughing.

 Grade: C

Older Reviews- 17 Again

            17 Again is a somewhat heartwarming but easily forgettable family comedy. That said, there are worse movies out there.

            The plot is all too familiar. Mike O’Donnell, a bitter 37-year-old man (Matthew Perry) makes a wish to be young again, and a magical janitor is all too happy to grant this wish. Yawn. The man turns 17 again (hence the title) and is reincarnated as teen heartthrob Zac Efron. Double yawn. The moral of the story: appreciate what you have, be careful what you wish for, and family is the most important and worthwhile thing you could ever have in life. Fine, but this movie has been made so many times that High School Musical 4 would have been better.

            There are some laughs in this movie. Thomas Lennon shines as Zac Efron/Matthew Perry’s best friend, and all fantasy/sci fi/computer geeks will appreciate the references that come from his character. I laughed out loud when called himself pathetic for having a replica of Gandalf the Grey’s quarterstaff from Two Towers, only to have his uptight and conservative date (Melora Hardin) reply, “You’re right, it is pathetic. Especially since Gandalf the Grey was only in The Fellowship of the Ring. In Two Towers, he is reincarnated as Gandalf the White.” The rest of their conversation continues in Elvish, and I found myself wondering if it was Quenya or Sindarin, as the film never specifies and I never finished learning the language in high school. That said, these jokes might not be as funny to less geeky audiences.

            Otherwise, the movie is pretty standard. Michelle Trachtenberg’s character is wholly unlikable, as is that of her standard teenage bully of a boyfriend (played by Hunter Parrish, whose apparent popularity is as inexplicable as the casting director’s decision to cast Matthew Perry as an older Zac Efron). Leslie Mann is gorgeous as Perry/Efron’s wife, but her scenes with Zac Efron tend to be a little creepy in a Stacey’s Mom/MILF obsessed world (as are Efron’s scenes with Trachtenberg). Sterling Knight is sweet and adorable as Alex, and he and Efron probably have the best chemistry of anyone in the film (short of Lennon and Hardin, of course). And Zac Efron is passable, occasionally believable as a 37-year-old in a 17-year-old’s body, but not really stretching himself in any other way (in how many movies is he planning to be a basketball star?).

            Even with these flaws, the movie does manage to be a little heartwarming. The moral is clear, and Mike’s desperate desire to stay close to and protect his children is the best seen in a live-action family comedy since Mrs. Doubtfire (though not nearly as good as Finding Nemo- sorry, Disney). Shame that this will be lost on the teeny-bopper audience waiting for Efron to stare moodily into the camera, and that audiences that would understand would never want to see this movie. Grade: B-

Yet Another Review Blog- Updated

So, clearly this blog has never been updated. Well, that's about to change. Here are some of my new policies:

1. I am accepting multiple authors. If you are interested in writing for Yet Another Review Blog, comment with your blogger username/email address, and I'll add you. 

2. I will take requests. If you would like something reviewed, tell me, and I will review it. This is what the comments are for. 

3. Jump in, read, enjoy. 

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Members' Links


Stevie Bramson's blog reel at www.mediaslayerproductions.com.



Review the FAQ for link policies. 

Archive

Movies:

Music:

Books:

Yet Another Review Blog- FAQ

What is this blog? 
It's as the title states- a review blog. We review anything and everything we feel like reviewing- new and old, music, movie, book, game, store, or anything else we can think of. 

Who runs this blog? 

What do I have to do to write for the blog? 
Comment on one of the entries with the email address you use for your blogger. I (Stephanie) will then send you an invitation to be a contributer to the blog. 

Is there a limit to the number of contributers?
There can only be up to 100 contributers at a time. There won't likely be an issue with having too many, but should an issue arise, I will delete people based on how frequently they post.

Oh no! Are you going to delete me? 
Don't worry- I'll warn you first and offer you the choice of continuing to write or having your name taken off the list. Plus, this will only happen if we get over 100 contributers. 

Do I have to write every day?
Write as often as you'd like. The more the merrier. 

What can I review?
Whatever you want, really. Try to limit multiple reviews, unless you really disagree with the original reviewer and want to post your own take. Also, avoid inappropriate content (ie blatant pornography). 

Can I share my account?
Go right ahead. Just make sure you credit your post to whomever wrote it. 

Can I tell all my friends?
Please do! 

Will you link to my page? 
Yet Another Review Blog maintains a list of links that its members provide. If you want to submit a link, it will be reviewed for content. If your link is approved, you must link to Yet Another Review Blog on your own page before we link to yours. 

Is there an archive of old reviews? 

I have more questions. Will you answer them? 
Post all questions in the comments in the blog, or email me at sbramson@fandm.edu.